Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Laura Svatikova vs Mayu Crossley Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Svatikova vs Crossley analysis and find out who is favored!
Laura Svatikova vs Mayu Crossley Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Svatikova 0 - 0 Crossley
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Svatikova has won 53.01% of points on their second serve, while Crossley has won 53.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Svatikova, in recent form, has won 56.4% of their opponent's second serve points, while Crossley has won 65.87%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.93% and 47.68% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Svatikova has saved 54.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Crossley has saved 60% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Svatikova has won 48.39% of matches played (W/L 15/ 16), with Crossley winning 83.33% (W/L 10/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Svatikova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13). Crossley has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 80% (W/L 4/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 77% (W/L 17/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Svatikova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.37% of matches (W/L 9/ 10), where as Crossley has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 80% of matches (W/L 8/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Svatikova has played against opponents with an average rank of 215.39 while Crossley has played against players with an average rank of 142.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Svatikova has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Crossley has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Svatikova has converted 43.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Crossley has converted 47.9% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
890
Rank
827
High
30
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
875
Rank
870
High
18
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
40% (114-174)
Career Total W/L
78% (21-6)
38% (3-5)
YTD W/L
83% (10-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Laura Svatikova vs Mayu Crossley For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Svatikova VS Crossley
Sportsbook
Offer
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Laura Svatikova | Mayu Crossley |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (3/5) | 83% (10/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 37% (7/12) | 77% (20/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (82/94) | 64% (144/82) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 83% (10/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 5 | 9 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 11 | 17 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:7:37 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 210.25 | 142.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (420/603) | 70% (472/677) |
| 1st Serve W% | 51% (215/420) | 58% (273/472) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (97/183) | 54% (110/205) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (35/80) | 48% (57/119) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (280/595) | 53% (373/703) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 80% (8/2) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) | 100% (2/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (3/8) | 83% (10/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 100% (8/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (8/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 50% (4/2) |
Laura Svatikova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Ziva Falkner
Player
Laura Svatikova
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Svatikova
Player
Anastasija Ignjatic
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jana Bojovic
Player
Laura Svatikova
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
78%
(
86 of
110)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
42 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Oana Gavrila
Player
Laura Svatikova
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Svatikova
Player
Anastasia Kovaleva
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
47 of
87)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
36 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Svatikova
Player
Barbara Dessolis
67%
(
76 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
77 of
116)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
11
49%
(
37 of
76)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
48%
(
55 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
62 of
116)
121
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(3) 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kaylah Mcphee
Player
Laura Svatikova
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
78
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalija Senic
Player
Laura Svatikova
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
46%
(
33 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Klaudija Bubelyte
Player
Laura Svatikova
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mayu Crossley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-4 2-6 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayu Crossley
Player
Denise Hrdinkova
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
54 of
72)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
27 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayu Crossley
Player
Emily Welker
79%
(
92 of
116)
1st Serve %
85%
(
107 of
126)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
46 of
92)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
42%
(
10 of
24)
Break Points Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
58 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
68 of
126)
126
Total Points Won
116
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Mayu Crossley
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
75%
(
70 of
93)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mayu Crossley
Player
Allie Kiick
70%
(
72 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
39%
(
40 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
103)
114
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 6-0 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mayu Crossley
Player
Christasha McNeil
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayu Crossley
Player
Hiroko Kuwata
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayu Crossley
Player
Marine Partaud
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mayu Crossley
Player
Mia Slama
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Svatikova Vs Crossley Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Svatikova are available here and Crossley photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
